Friday, June 08, 2007 - 01:26 pm, by: David Vaughan(Davidv)
What, that some mad bugger in a Supra is prone to driving defective cars (both his and his mother's - this idiocy runs in the family), blocking other traffic then throwing bottles at them?
I agree. I think it is important to be warned about that.
Friday, June 08, 2007 - 02:09 pm, by: Jeff Bedsor(Jeff_bedsor)
David I think you should read it again, the other guy threw the bottle and he was going 70 in an 80 zone in the left hand lane because it was raining and he knew the brakes weren't good. I would say that was being responsible and driving to the road conditions.
Friday, June 08, 2007 - 05:26 pm, by: David Vaughan(Davidv)
quote:
and the $$$$ chuked [sic] a bottle at the car
Yes, you are right. I thought he was the $$$$ but the Prado driver had a right to the description as well.
As for
quote:
he was going 70 in an 80 zone in the left hand lane because it was raining and he knew the brakes weren't good. I would say that was being responsible and driving to the road conditions.
He actually said
quote:
the brakes are stuffed
and that he was in the inside lane yet the Prado could not get past him on either side. Either side? Was he really on the inside edge of the road?
I do not call it responsible to drive that car except to crawl to the mechanic in good daylight conditions. He was driving it, at night in the rain, only because his existing car had a defect and for his own convenience ("to see the boyz'). Sounds like a history to me.
Note that until the gun was pulled on him he was about to get out of his car, to commit a road rage offence himself. I call him for what he obviously is.