Last x Days Posts  1 | 3 | 7 Days  Search  Topics  Tree View  Help
  Soarer Central * Transmission * Shift kit - prices and results * Archive through March 05, 2006 Previous Previous    Next Next  

Author Message
Ben Evans
TryHard
Qld
"Master Power" Turbo 1J With Xtras

Posts: 331
Reg: 07-2005

Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Rating: N/A
Votes: 0 (Vote!)

Tuesday, February 28, 2006 - 05:56 pm, by:  Ben Evans (Sbyder) Edit Post Delete Post Print Post   View Post/Check IP (Moderator/Admin Only) Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

hmmm... well there goes my idea of having 300rwkw :-(

I cant afford to get it rebuilt, so looks like i'll just be slower than i should be in order to save the box.

I want to tune my car to run 300RWKW when i need it, ie: drags, stupid guy in a skyline thinking he has a chance, etc...

I only want to run 200RWKW on low boost which will be 95% of the driving time.

I have a stage 2 shift kit(i think [only one copper pipe]), auto cooler, 3000ish stally and running synthetic fluid. The box is straight from a stocko soarer with 60,000kms on it.

What do you recon the chances are it'll hold up for a few years?

Ben

PS- i know the stally and shift kit helps with traction lose, got the back to slide out at 130km/h last night, scared the sh!t out of a guy in a commonwhore, ahahaha
Russell Newnham
Tinkerer
Victoria
TT

Posts: 20
Reg: 02-2006

Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Rating: N/A
Votes: 0 (Vote!)

Wednesday, March 01, 2006 - 11:42 am, by:  Russell Newnham (Silvercar) Edit Post Delete Post Print Post   View Post/Check IP (Moderator/Admin Only) Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

G'day Ben,

I have had one of the MV upgraded autos with 280 rwkW for a few years and it seems strong. I would only be guessing about 300 rwkw and a standard trans with a shift kit, but at over twice the standard power you would have to wonder about reliability. Also, Micheal is very experienced in making very tough trans for drag cars and based on this I would tend to believe him about the 265 rwkw.

You have a few more issues to work on yet as well though I think.

With 550 injectors and 280 rwkw I am at almost 90% duty cycle. In really cold weather and 300 rwkw I suspect you would have absolutely no safety margin.

Your ignition system would also need upgrading -although this depends upon the boost. If you can get the 300 kw at lower boost levels by using a bigger turbo your ignition may not break down - but big turbo means more lag.

Ignore this drivel if you have already sussed these issues out.
Chris Davey
TryHard
QLD
Corona

Posts: 448
Reg: 07-2005

Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Rating: N/A
Votes: 0 (Vote!)

Wednesday, March 01, 2006 - 11:55 am, by:  Chris Davey (Chris_davey) Edit Post Delete Post Print Post   View Post/Check IP (Moderator/Admin Only) Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Ben: I am in the same boat as you :-) Although my car is a lot lighter so that should help keep gearboxes alive.

I think as always it comes down to how you treat it. If you are only going to use high boost at the strip and you aren't going to be doing that every week then I think it would last a while. You never know for sure but that is my hunch. Change the fluid reguarly and don't flog the crap out of it on the street all the time and minimal stalling it up will help also.

Russell: you know what is weird. Neil I think it was said he made 293rwkw at an average of 85% duty cycle with 440's. Do you know what your air fuel is at 280rwkw? I would hazard a guess that you are running richer than Neil. Which could be why your power is a little lower (or could be dyno difference :-))

Also, re spark blow out. You say that running a larger turbo at lower boost will help prevent this. I would have thought that it would be the volume of air entering the cylinder rather than boost pressure. ie. 15psi on stock twins may not blow out but 15psi on GT42 might. Also, if this is the case wouldn't getting longer duration, higher lift cams mean spark would blow out at lower boost levels also.

Sorry about going off topic but I hope it helps people :-)
Cihan Aday
DieHard
Victoria
JZZ30

Posts: 564
Reg: 07-2005

Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Rating: N/A
Votes: 0 (Vote!)

Wednesday, March 01, 2006 - 02:18 pm, by:  Cihan Aday (Cihan) Edit Post Delete Post Print Post   View Post/Check IP (Moderator/Admin Only) Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

15psi on ct12s or 15psi on a GT42 will make the same power. The only reason why they never do is because of efficiency and turbine size. Power is lost because of additional heat introduced to the intake charge by the smaller compressor running out of spec. Smaller turbos tend to have smaller exhaust AR's and turbines, this converts to backpressure which limits cylinder flow.

So you would be right on the money Chris. Cylinder flow is what blows out spark, a larger turbo = potentially, higher cylinder flow = more chance of spark blowout.

Cheers,
Cihan.
Simon Triantafillou
DieHard
NSW
Soarer Turbo

Posts: 544
Reg: 07-2005

Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Rating: N/A
Votes: 0 (Vote!)

Wednesday, March 01, 2006 - 02:27 pm, by:  Simon Triantafillou (Soarer) Edit Post Delete Post Print Post   View Post/Check IP (Moderator/Admin Only) Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)


Cihan Aday wrote on Wednesday, March 01, 2006 - 02:18 pm:

15psi on ct12s or 15psi on a GT42 will make the same power. The only reason why they never do is because of efficiency and turbine size.




Make up your mind... first you say they make the same power, then in the following sentence, you say it can never happen.

Believe me, 20psi on twin hybrids gave me about 100kw less than my GT3540R on 20psi. Same boost, more airflow.
Chris Davey
TryHard
QLD
Corona

Posts: 454
Reg: 07-2005

Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Rating: N/A
Votes: 0 (Vote!)

Wednesday, March 01, 2006 - 02:32 pm, by:  Chris Davey (Chris_davey) Edit Post Delete Post Print Post   View Post/Check IP (Moderator/Admin Only) Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Thanks for the confirmation Cihan :-)

Maybe I should spend some money on a HKS DLI instead of some cams then :-)
Emanuel Spinola
Moderator
NSW
JZZ30, UZZ32

Posts: 682
Reg: 07-2005

Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Rating: N/A
Votes: 0 (Vote!)

Wednesday, March 01, 2006 - 02:50 pm, by:  Emanuel Spinola (Manny) Edit Post Delete Post Print Post   View Post/Check IP (Moderator/Admin Only) Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Boost doesn't blow out spark - it's not a candle with a naked flame blowing in the breeze ??
Russell Newnham
Tinkerer
Victoria
TT

Posts: 21
Reg: 02-2006

Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Rating: N/A
Votes: 0 (Vote!)

Wednesday, March 01, 2006 - 04:03 pm, by:  Russell Newnham (Silvercar) Edit Post Delete Post Print Post   View Post/Check IP (Moderator/Admin Only) Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Did Neil really get 290+ rwkw with 440s? What was his duty cycle? Must have been close to 100%.

My tuning was done by the Motec dealer with a wide band oxygen sensor and was as lean as he thinks was safe. I think he must be a little more conservative than other, if others are getting these power figures with 440s. Either that or something else is not right, but I can't think what.

I was lead to believe that it is was increased cylinder pressure that causes problems with cylinder ignition which, in turn, is linked to increased boost.

Comments?

I tried a HKS DLI and it made no difference in my car, although some say they have observed improvements. I ended up with a Motec CDI which was bloody expensive but very effective.
Emanuel Spinola
Moderator
NSW
JZZ30, UZZ32

Posts: 683
Reg: 07-2005

Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Rating: N/A
Votes: 0 (Vote!)

Wednesday, March 01, 2006 - 04:35 pm, by:  Emanuel Spinola (Manny) Edit Post Delete Post Print Post   View Post/Check IP (Moderator/Admin Only) Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Russell
My 550cc injectors were also at 95%+ duty cycle at 302rwkw which matches what others have since got as well as your own experience. To have a lower duty cycle with smaller injectors at similar boost/power figures defies logic and would indicate a comparison between apples and oranges.

Yep, elevated cylinder pressure (higher boost) requires a stronger spark to be able to arch from the central electrode to the ground electrode.

I personally can't praise the HKS DLI enough as my ignition system has been faultless at any boost level since I wired it in a few years back.
Cihan Aday
DieHard
Victoria
JZZ30

Posts: 567
Reg: 07-2005

Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Rating: N/A
Votes: 0 (Vote!)

Wednesday, March 01, 2006 - 05:30 pm, by:  Cihan Aday (Cihan) Edit Post Delete Post Print Post   View Post/Check IP (Moderator/Admin Only) Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)


Simon Triantafillou wrote on Wednesday, March 01, 2006 - 02:27 pm:

Make up your mind... first you say they make the same power, then in the following sentence, you say it can never happen.

Believe me, 20psi on twin hybrids gave me about 100kw less than my GT3540R on 20psi. Same boost, more airflow.



Simon, they can make the same power at the same boost... But, as i said before it wont happen for various reasons (nothings perfect, simple physics interveins).

Things that effect power = flow(CFM), temperature, pressure, humidity.

Increase flow through engine = more power.
Decrease temperature = more power.
Increase intake charge pressure = more power.
Decrease humidity = more power.

By changing the turbo size, intercooler piping diameter, dump pipe size or various induction parts, you can increase the flow rate of the engine leading to more power. When we talk about flow we MUST consider RPM, naturally a larger turbo will make its boost later and hold that boost to higher RPM, which means more torque at higher RPM which means more peak power. Peak torque may be less or similar, but the flow rate of the engine will be higher because of the RPM associated with turbo size, not the turbo size directly.

Now that thats covered, take twin hybrids VS a single GT3540R running at 20psi as an example.

The hybrids compressors are running close too, or out of their efficiency island supplying the amount of flow required to presurise the whole induction system to 20PSI. Because of dump pipe diameter, we can assume that the exhaust turbine and low AR ratio of the Hybrids are causing additional backpressure to buildup as the boost raises.

Since the Hybrids are moving out of their efficiency range, the compressed air leaving the compressor raises in temperature. Also, because of the backpressure building up as boost raises - the flowrate of exhaust gas leaving the cylinder is limited/resticted.

If we look at the GT3540R setup, you would have a nice and large 4" intake pipe setup to a heatsheilded pod filter, 3" diameter piping off the compressor outlet into a large low pressure drop intercooler. The large compressor, designed specifically for larger than 500Hp applications is having no trouble supplying the airflow required to keep the intake charge pressurised to 20psi. It is within the high efficiency island of the compressor (usually btw %75-%78), hence, the intake charge is pressurised with the highest efficency (lowest temperature increase) possible with this compressor.
The exhaust turbine is suitably sized to flow the required volume of exhaust gasses, with a nice and large dump pipe and minimal bends. A suitibly exhaust side AR ratio would have been picked to find a nice balance between peak power, response and backpressure.

Your confusion is simple. Your saying bigger turbo = more power because of flow.. But in reality, the flowrate of air through the engine has little to do with the turbocharger used. It has everything to do with the size of the intake piping and subsequent restrictions before or after the cylinders.

For a given power, boost and RPM, it doesnt matter what turbo you use.. flow will be the same.

A 30cm 3" pipe at 10psi holds a same volume of air as a 30cm 3" pipe at 20psi, just more oxygen (in context). It doesnt matter what fills it, all that matters is what its filled 'with'. The turbo's job is to fill the pipe without heating its contents or causing a restriction when it comes out the other side.

Cheers,
Cihan.
Ben Evans
TryHard
Qld
"Master Power" Turbo 1J With Xtras

Posts: 333
Reg: 07-2005

Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Rating: N/A
Votes: 0 (Vote!)

Wednesday, March 01, 2006 - 05:40 pm, by:  Ben Evans (Sbyder) Edit Post Delete Post Print Post   View Post/Check IP (Moderator/Admin Only) Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

nah, i dont think so.

We need it MORE INDEPTH!

AHAHAHAHA
Paul Brockbank
TryHard
WA
Soarer TT

Posts: 410
Reg: 07-2005

Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Rating: N/A
Votes: 0 (Vote!)

Thursday, March 02, 2006 - 01:56 am, by:  Paul Brockbank (Brockas) Edit Post Delete Post Print Post   View Post/Check IP (Moderator/Admin Only) Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)


Emanuel Spinola wrote on Wednesday, March 01, 2006 - 04:35 pm:

My 550cc injectors were also at 95%+ duty cycle at 302rwkw which matches what others have since got as well as your own experience. To have a lower duty cycle with smaller injectors at similar boost/power figures defies logic and would indicate a comparison between apples and oranges.



Has anyone experimented with options in the Wolf etc like 'batch fire'?

Also, if the ignition is retarded enough, whats to stop someone running leaner afr's?
Might be a pig to drive, but would stop you upgrading injectors.
(I ask because I have a friend who made 511rwhp on stock rb25det injectors, using a wolf. I know it sounds impossible, but its been discussed many a time).

As for the initial question about the shift kit.
My time went from 13.41 to 13.21 with just the installation of a stage 1.5 shift kit.
Chris Davey
TryHard
QLD
Corona

Posts: 457
Reg: 07-2005

Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Rating: N/A
Votes: 0 (Vote!)

Thursday, March 02, 2006 - 09:02 am, by:  Chris Davey (Chris_davey) Edit Post Delete Post Print Post   View Post/Check IP (Moderator/Admin Only) Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

I think what you are referring to Paul is a bit of a band aid fix. I think I will be upgrading injectors in the future but not until I actually make some power.
Paul Brockbank
TryHard
WA
Soarer TT

Posts: 416
Reg: 07-2005

Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Rating: N/A
Votes: 0 (Vote!)

Friday, March 03, 2006 - 03:04 pm, by:  Paul Brockbank (Brockas) Edit Post Delete Post Print Post   View Post/Check IP (Moderator/Admin Only) Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Oh it's definitely a 'band-aid' fix, and I wouldn't even consider doing it, just wondering if it is possible for those who refuse to fork out of decent injectors...
Lew Radbourn
Trader
Queensland
jzz30 / uzz30/ uzz31

Posts: 620
Reg: 07-2005

Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Rating: N/A
Votes: 0 (Vote!)

Friday, March 03, 2006 - 07:21 pm, by:  Lew Radbourn (Marlew) Edit Post Delete Post Print Post   View Post/Check IP (Moderator/Admin Only) Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Paul ya mates RB 25 may be running a different fuel reg as well ????
were as we can't we have side feed injectors and placing a different high pressure reg on rail
could possible blow out the "O" rings from around the injectors and fill the engine bay with fuel and that will be nasty.
RB's run top feed???
if so you can hold them down tighter and that will allow higher pressures to be run.
Paul Brockbank
TryHard
WA
Soarer TT

Posts: 418
Reg: 07-2005

Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Rating: N/A
Votes: 0 (Vote!)

Saturday, March 04, 2006 - 03:55 am, by:  Paul Brockbank (Brockas) Edit Post Delete Post Print Post   View Post/Check IP (Moderator/Admin Only) Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Yes I'm pretty sure they are top-feed.

511rhhp (note: hub hp). There wasn't stupid fuel pressure (the rail pressure was 30psi up to 50psi rising rate reg), timing was the key.
There are dozens of threads on SAU about it (for example -
http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=54906&hl=511rwhp)
That motor has since popped (excessive timing), been rebuilt, and now making a reliable 390rwhp with a basic tune.

I'm just wondering if the same kind of power levels are possible using 100% duty cycle on the std 330cc injectors.

I still don't see the point though, injectors are pretty cheap.
Chris Davey
TryHard
QLD
Corona

Posts: 466
Reg: 07-2005

Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Rating: N/A
Votes: 0 (Vote!)

Saturday, March 04, 2006 - 10:27 am, by:  Chris Davey (Chris_davey) Edit Post Delete Post Print Post   View Post/Check IP (Moderator/Admin Only) Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

lew: is base pressure 38psi stock? I read that somewhere but can't remember. I remember seeing mine go to 40psi or so when I had a fuel pressure guage on it. Stock FPR at the moment.

What sort of pressures are you talking to blow the o-rings out? I know of one guy who runs 60psi base pressure with 440's and is making good power. 360rwkw through a manual.
Simon Triantafillou
DieHard
NSW
Soarer Turbo

Posts: 551
Reg: 07-2005

Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Rating: N/A
Votes: 0 (Vote!)

Saturday, March 04, 2006 - 10:49 am, by:  Simon Triantafillou (Soarer) Edit Post Delete Post Print Post   View Post/Check IP (Moderator/Admin Only) Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Base fuel pressure is 3 bar from memory.
Chris Davey
TryHard
QLD
Corona

Posts: 467
Reg: 07-2005

Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Rating: N/A
Votes: 0 (Vote!)

Saturday, March 04, 2006 - 11:11 am, by:  Chris Davey (Chris_davey) Edit Post Delete Post Print Post   View Post/Check IP (Moderator/Admin Only) Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

you sure? I have heard of people running 40psi with an adjustable FPR. Wouldn't have thought they would decrease it? This is with top feed injectors.
Simon Triantafillou
DieHard
NSW
Soarer Turbo

Posts: 552
Reg: 07-2005

Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Rating: N/A
Votes: 0 (Vote!)

Saturday, March 04, 2006 - 11:38 am, by:  Simon Triantafillou (Soarer) Edit Post Delete Post Print Post   View Post/Check IP (Moderator/Admin Only) Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

http://soarercentral.com/cgi-bin/sc-forum/show.cgi?tpc=126&post=26023#POST26023

Not sure about top feeds. I was talking about 1JZ TT factory setup.
Benjamin Burgess
TryHard
NSW
Toyota Soarer GT-TL

Posts: 279
Reg: 07-2005

Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Rating: N/A
Votes: 0 (Vote!)

Saturday, March 04, 2006 - 11:50 am, by:  Benjamin Burgess (Jampac) Edit Post Delete Post Print Post   View Post/Check IP (Moderator/Admin Only) Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Yeah base fuel pressure is
43.4psi@0psi boost. I saw my one go to about 60psi last night with the boost in it. I run the stock reg.
Chris Davey
TryHard
QLD
Corona

Posts: 468
Reg: 07-2005

Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Rating: N/A
Votes: 0 (Vote!)

Saturday, March 04, 2006 - 12:21 pm, by:  Chris Davey (Chris_davey) Edit Post Delete Post Print Post   View Post/Check IP (Moderator/Admin Only) Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

well there you go. :-)

I have been trying to find that out for a while.

I have a malpassi still sitting in my garage and I am not sure if I will use it. I was thinking of possibly installing another 040 pump (internal) when required if that is possible and then I would have 2 inlet fuel lines. Actually scratch that as I would still be using stock fuel rail with single inlet and outlet so I can still use my stock FPR as well.

I was thinking of going to lift pump, surge tank and single 044(850cc injectors) and a dry shot of n20 if required :-)
Lew Radbourn
Trader
Queensland
jzz30 / uzz30/ uzz31

Posts: 623
Reg: 07-2005

Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Rating: N/A
Votes: 0 (Vote!)

Sunday, March 05, 2006 - 08:54 am, by:  Lew Radbourn (Marlew) Edit Post Delete Post Print Post   View Post/Check IP (Moderator/Admin Only) Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Chris;
Mate i don't know what pressure you would need to make the "O" rings start leaking around the injectors.
and really mate i don't want to find out either...
i personally just wouldn't do it mate
it could be just above stock pressure it also could be 80 psi you just don't know.
it also depends on the condition of your "O" rings around the injector.
there is just no clamping effect on the "O" rings as like the top feed injectors.
it only has static pressure on the "O" ring.
i strongly advice against raising pressure on side feed injectors

BUT mate that is just me.
cheers
Lew
Paul Brockbank
TryHard
WA
Soarer TT

Posts: 423
Reg: 07-2005

Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Rating: N/A
Votes: 0 (Vote!)

Sunday, March 05, 2006 - 12:41 pm, by:  Paul Brockbank (Brockas) Edit Post Delete Post Print Post   View Post/Check IP (Moderator/Admin Only) Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Lew as a rough guide what is involved in changing from side-feed to top-feed?

Is it as simple as swapping the rail?
Chris Davey
TryHard
QLD
Corona

Posts: 470
Reg: 07-2005

Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Rating: N/A
Votes: 0 (Vote!)

Sunday, March 05, 2006 - 05:37 pm, by:  Chris Davey (Chris_davey) Edit Post Delete Post Print Post   View Post/Check IP (Moderator/Admin Only) Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Thanks Lew. Won't be whacking this malpassi on anytime soon then :-)

Paul: AFAIK that is correct. You would obviously need the correct fittings on each end of the rail.

  Administration Administration      Log Out Log Out Previous Previous      Next Next